Cookies

We use cookies to help us provide you with the best experience, improve and tailor our services, and carry out our marketing activities. For more information, including how to manage your cookie settings, see our privacy notice.

OK

Skip to content. | Skip to navigation

Community-made content which you can improve Case study from our community

How to Evaluate your Local Area

How to Evaluate your Local Area

Revisions
(+) Added (-) Deleted
Description
All Fair Share Trust (FST) Local Agents are required to undertake evaluations as part of the programme. The purpose of FST local evaluation is threefold:
Normal 0 false false false MicrosoftInternetExplorer4 /* Style Definitions */ table.MsoNormalTable {mso-style-name:"Table Normal"; mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0; mso-tstyle-colband-size:0; mso-style-noshow:yes; mso-style-parent:""; mso-padding-alt:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt; mso-para-margin:0cm; mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt; mso-pagination:widow-orphan; font-size:10.0pt; font-family:"Times New Roman"; mso-ansi-language:#0400; mso-fareast-language:#0400; mso-bidi-language:#0400;} All FST Local Agents are required to undertake evaluations as part of the programme. The purpose of FST local evaluation is threefold: 1. for funded groups – to celebrate and raise profile; 2. for Local Agents – to assess work done and measure impact; 3. for CFN – to share learning & highlight recommendations for future funding.  Around the network, a variety of methods have been used and lessons learned which will be helpful for Local Agents and any funders or groups looking to evaluate the work they have done. This document looks at some of this learning from around the network. 1. for funded groups – to celebrate and raise profile; 2. for Local Agents – to assess work done and measure impact; 3. for CFN – to share learning & highlight recommendations for future funding. Around the network, a variety of methods have been used and lessons learned which will be helpful for Local Agents and any funders or groups looking to evaluate the work they have done. This document looks at some of this learning from around the network.
Editors
fairsharetrust fairsharetrust ; Stephanie.Hill ; webtemp@ncvo-vol.org.uk ; markb@textmatters.com ; chrismilway@googlemail.com ; stacey.bennett@ncvo.org.uk ; variouseyest@gmail.com ; ashwinkumare994@gmail.com ; rupinder.dhaliwal@ncvo.org.uk
Description

delete: </p> delete: <p style="text-align: justify;"> delete: <strong> All FST Fair Share Trust (FST) Local Agents are required to undertake evaluations as part of the programme. The purpose of FST local evaluation delete: </strong> delete: <strong> is threefold: delete: </strong>

delete: <p style="text-align: justify;"> delete: <strong> insert: <p>

1. for funded groups – to celebrate and raise profile; delete: </strong>

delete: <p style="text-align: justify;"> delete: <strong> insert: <p>

2. for Local Agents – to assess work done and measure impact; delete: </strong>

delete: <p style="text-align: justify;"> delete: <strong> insert: <p>

3. for CFN – to share learning & highlight recommendations for future funding. delete: </strong>

delete: <p style="text-align: justify;">  Around insert: <p>

Around the network, a variety of methods have been used and lessons learned which will be helpful for Local Agents and any funders or groups looking to evaluate the work they have done. This document looks at some of this learning from around the network.

Further information
delete: <p> delete: </p> delete: <p style="text-align: justify;" class="Bullets"> delete: <strong> Key Reccomendations delete: </strong> delete: </p> delete: <p style="text-align: justify;" class="Bullets"> Below are some of the key recommendations made by Local Agents on working with independent evaluators: delete: </p> delete: <ul> delete: <li> in the most successful evaluations, consultants had prior knowledge of the sector and the FST area delete: </li> delete: <li> evaluators need to factor in community consultation delete: </li> delete: <li> evaluators spent time with the funded projects and other stakeholders in the community, gathering views to ensure that they were clear about strengths and weaknesses of the programme delete: </li> delete: <li> consultants with more creative and qualitative approaches may be more attuned to the spirit of FST. delete: </li> delete: </ul>
Tags

This field has no inline difference view.

Publishing Date

This field has no inline difference view.

Help us to improve this page – give us feedback.