Cookies on Knowhow

We use cookies in order for parts of NCVO Knowhow to work properly, and also to collect information about how you use the site. We use this information to improve the site and tailor our services to you. For more, see our page on privacy and data protection.


Skip to content. | Skip to navigation

Community-made content which you can improve Case study from our community

Due Diligence

This page is free to all
Actions to ensure a planned merger is in the best interests of your organisations and beneficiaries

What is due diligence?

Due diligence is a term used to describe the investigative steps voluntary and community organisations (VCOs) take to assure themselves that a merger is in the best interests of their organisations and beneficiaries. The result of a due diligence exercise should be that a VCO has full knowledge of the organisation with which it seeks to merge.

Mergers have the potential to expose VCOs to a variety of risks, including additional liabilities. Trustees must comply with their legal duty to act prudently. When planning a proposed merger, trustees should ensure that they have identified any potential risks to their organisation before entering into an agreement.

Where there is a collaboration involving significant financial or reputational risks the same process may also be used.

What areas are looked at in a due diligence exercise?

The scope of due diligence varies according to the size and complexity of the organisations concerned. The checks carried out should be proportionate to the amount of risk and nature of activities involved.

The main elements of due diligence are:

  •  Financial (e.g. financial history or accounting systems)
  •  Legal (e.g. governing documents or contracts of employment)
  •  Strategic and operational (e.g. organisational culture or IT systems)

Before commencing due diligence in any of these areas, it is important to agree the scope of the work and the arrangements for liaising with the other parties involved in the due diligence process. The organisations involved should also exchange confidentiality agreements.

Deal breakers

It is preferable to identify any major potential barriers to merger before instigating a due diligence exercise, as the external professional costs could be significant. These major potential barriers are sometimes called deal breakers, examples of which might include:

  • Not having a clear business case for merging
  • Incompatible objects in governing documents
  • The size and composition of the new trustee board
  • The name of the new entity
  • Different cultures
  • Pension scheme deficits

Often, through discussion, deal breakers are surmountable, and organisations can proceed to due diligence.

How much can you do in-house?

You can manage the due diligence process yourself and decide whether to bring in professionals on certain key areas. The extent to which you decide to carry out due diligence work in-house will be guided by the answers to the following questions:

  • Do your trustees have the necessary expertise?
  • Do the people with the expertise have sufficient time?
  • Are the people sufficiently independent and objective to identify the searching questions?
  • Do they have the necessary verbal, written and interpersonal skills to ask challenging questions without adversely affecting the working relationship with the prospective partner?

Due diligence provides detailed knowledge which may help build trust during the merger negotiations, and establish the foundations for trust, confidence and transparency after the merger has been completed. The exercise will increase the likelihood of trustees being able to identify and address problems at an early stage, and enhance the potential for a successful merger.

Whenever a due diligence exercise is carried out, the final responsibility for its accuracy and appropriateness rests with the trustees.

Further resources

The Charity Commission’s guidance on collaboration and mergers has a section on due diligence

Page last edited May 24, 2017

Help us to improve this page – give us feedback.

1 star 2 stars 3 stars 4 stars 5 stars 3/5 from 1353 ratings